Davis v. Putin et al
Plaintiff: Andrew C. Davis
Defendant: Vladimir Putin and Rosatom Corporation
Case Number: 5:2021cv00292
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.)
August 23, 2021 Filing 6 Document: Proposed Summons filed by Andrew C. Davis. (Castania, M)
August 23, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Andrew C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Castania, M)
August 5, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Andrew C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Copy of #2 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY, #2 Cover Letter/Proposed Amended Complaint, #3 Envelope) (Tripp, S.) Modified on 8/10/2021 to revise docket text. (Collins, S.).
August 4, 2021 Filing 3 Document: The Soviet Weapons Program - The Tsar Bomba filed by Andrew C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Copy of #2 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY, #2 Envelope) (Tripp, S.)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected documents within fourteen (14) days from the filing of this order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/20/2021. A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Andrew C. Davis, Central Regional Hospital, 300 Veazey Rd., Butner, NC 27509 with blank forms and pro se complaint packet. (Collins, S.)
July 19, 2021 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Andrew C. Davis. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.)
July 19, 2021 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (No Filing Fee Paid), filed by Andrew C. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Rudd, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Putin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew C. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vladimir Putin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosatom Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?