United States of America v. $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
$30,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
Kevin Ramdhanie |
5:2021cv00354 |
September 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
18 U.S.C. ยง 981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 USM-285 Form - Affidavit of Service for Complaint for Forfeiture/Warrant served on $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency on 10/29/2021 - Asset in USMS custody. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 6 CLAIM Verified Claim for $30,000 by Kevin Ramdhanie. (Lazzaro, Lance) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Lance G. Lazzaro on behalf of Kevin Ramdhanie. (Lazzaro, Lance) |
Filing 4 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/7/2021. (Rudd, D.) |
Remark - Notice of Request for Issuance of Warrant #3 referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Notice Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Warrant) (Fesak, Matthew) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew Lee Fesak on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Fesak, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $30,000.00 in U.S. Currency, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration of Senior Inspector Adam Wiza, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fesak, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.