Harvey v. Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC
Merry Harvey |
Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC |
5:2021cv00396 |
September 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Financial Disclosure Statement by Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC (McVey, Andrew) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Kent McVey on behalf of All Defendants. (McVey, Andrew) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by June K. Allison on behalf of Merry Harvey. (Allison, June) |
SECOND Notice to Counsel. Attorney June Allison should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Collins, S.) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S.) |
Notice to Counsel. Attorney June Allison should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Collins, S.) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
Notice to Counsel - The address information in the signature block for Valerie L. Bateman on the complaint does not match the information that the court has in its CM/ECF database. Counsel should email the updated law firm information to the clerk's office at NCED-AttomeyUpdate@nced.uscourts.gov. Once updated, the new contact information will be reflected on the docket of all cases in which counsel entered an appearance. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Merry Harvey (Bateman, Valerie) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6252434.), filed by Merry Harvey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bateman, Valerie) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Valerie L. Bateman on behalf of Merry Harvey. (Bateman, Valerie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6252434.), filed by Merry Harvey. (Bateman, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harvey v. Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Merry Harvey | |
Represented By: | Valerie L. Bateman |
Represented By: | June K. Allison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pharmaceutical Product Development LLC | |
Represented By: | Andrew Kent McVey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.