Helsius v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Plaintiff: Jonathon Helsius
Defendant: Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Case Number: 5:2021cv00433
Filed: October 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion regarding #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jonathon Helsius. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law) (Brown, Moses)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response regarding #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response due by 12/10/2021. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/16/2021. (Collins, S.)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Jonathon Helsius. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Brown, Moses)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice to Counsel regarding: #9 Notice of Appearance. The attorney information in the signature block does not match the information the court has in its CM/ECF database. Counsel is directed to update contact information in CM/ECF by choosing "Utilities" and selecting "Maintain Your Account." Contact the clerk's office if additional assistance is required. (Collins, S.)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER - Ordinarily at this juncture the court would trigger the parties' scheduling conference activities, and deadline for provision of their joint report and plan through issuance of initial order regarding planning and scheduling. Where defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, good cause appears to delay these activities. Unless a party raises objection in filing due within 14 days from this date, the court stays the parties' scheduling conference activities pending decision on motion filed 10/29/21. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/12/2021. (Collins, S.)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jonathon Helsius (Brown, Moses)
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Moses Vincent Brown on behalf of Jonathon Helsius. (Brown, Moses)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Memorandum in Support regarding #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. (Wilson, Danielle)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. (Wilson, Danielle)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice to Counsel regarding: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #8 Memorandum in Support. In future filings, counsel should indicate the division in accordance with Local Civil Rule 10.1(b) and 40.1(b) and (c). (Collins, S.)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S.)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice regarding #1 Notice of Removal and requirement to make a Notice of Appearance sent to Plaintiff's Counsel, Moses V. Brown & James E. Hairston, Jr. of Hairston Lane, PA at 434 Fayetteville Street, Suite 2350, Raleigh, NC 27601 mailed via US mail on October 26, 2021. (Rudd, D.)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Jesse Huntsman Rigsby, IV on behalf of Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. (Rigsby, Jesse)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority (Wilson, Danielle)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Danielle Barbour Wilson on behalf of Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. (Wilson, Danielle)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice filed by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority Supplemental Removal Cover Sheet. (Wilson, Danielle)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority from Wake Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-016179. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6287440), filed by Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Pleadings State Court, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Notice to State Court of Removal, #4 Exhibit Ex. C - Notice of Removal to Adverse Party) (Wilson, Danielle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helsius v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathon Helsius
Represented By: Moses Vincent Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Represented By: Jesse Huntsman Rigsby, IV
Represented By: Danielle Barbour Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?