Allen v. City of Raleigh Police Department et al
| Wanda Marie Allen |
| City of Raleigh Police Department and Captian Marr |
| 5:2021cv00471 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Richard E Myers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants City of Raleigh Police Department and Captain Murr shall have up to and including Thursday, February 17, 2022, to serve their answers, motions or pleadings in response to the Complaint. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/10/2022. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Captian Marr, City of Raleigh Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter from Defendants' counsel to Plaintiff seeking consent and views, #2 Proposed Order) (Simmons, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 Financial Disclosure Statement by Captian Marr (Simmons, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by City of Raleigh Police Department (Simmons, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Christopher J Simmons on behalf of All Defendants. (Simmons, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 Process Receipt and Return - Captian Marr served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 7 Process Receipt and Return - City of Raleigh Police Department served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Captian Marr and City of Raleigh Police Department. (Attachments: #1 US Marshals Service Forms) (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Captian Marr and City of Raleigh Police Department, filed by Wanda Marie Allen. (Waddell, K.) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 12/7/2021. (Waddell, K.)
|
| Remark - Filed-stamped copies of #4 order, summonses, and complaint forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service, along with USM-285 forms. (Waddell, K.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.) |
|
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court and for the efficient administration of justice, this case is reassigned to Chief United States District Judge Richard E. Myers II for all further proceedings. United States District Judge Terrence W. Boyle is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings should reflect the revised case number of 5:21-CV-471-M. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 11/17/2021. (Hockaday, A.)
|
| Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Wanda Marie Allen. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Wanda Marie Allen. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Wanda Marie Allen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
