Auteri v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Keawe Blade Auteri
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Randell Scott Branch
Case Number: 5:2021cv00489
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to US Attorney General. (Waddell, K.)
November 30, 2021 Filing 6 Amended Notice of Appearance by Keawe Blade Auteri. (Austin, John)
November 30, 2021 Filing 5 Proposed Summons, filed by Keawe Blade Auteri . (Austin, John) Modified on 11/30/2021 to clarify document description (Waddell, K.).
November 30, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Randell Scott Branch and Office of the United States Attorney. (Waddell, K.)
November 30, 2021 Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint. Since the defendants are a government agency and a employee of a government agency, summonses are required for the appropriate defendants, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney. The court has received summonses for the defendants and the U.S. Attorney. Counsel is directed to file a summons for the U.S. Attorney General using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.)
November 30, 2021 Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Notice of Appearance. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the notice of appearance) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.)
November 29, 2021 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Keawe Blade Auteri (Austin, John)
November 29, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by John S. Austin on behalf of Keawe Blade Auteri. (Austin, John)
November 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Randell Scott Branch, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6334098.), filed by Keawe Blade Auteri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons To United States, #3 Proposed Summons Summons To Randell Branch, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A - Denied Letter) (Austin, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Auteri v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keawe Blade Auteri
Represented By: John S. Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randell Scott Branch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?