United States of America v. Blakney
| United States of America |
| Larry Blakney |
| 5:2021hc02160 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| W Earl Britt |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 4241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition regarding #16 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of United States v. Curbow, No. 20-7797 (4th Cir.) filed by Larry Blakney. (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of United States v. Curbow, No. 20-7797 (4th Cir.) filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Seal Document #14 PROPOSED SEALED Document,, #12 PROPOSED SEALED MOTION (Selected Participants Only)by Snayha M. Nath (available to: Respondent Larry Blakney, Petitioner United States of America) filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 14 PROPOSED SEALED Document: (Selected Participants Only)by Snayha M. Nath (available to: Respondent Larry Blakney, Petitioner United States of America) regarding #12 PROPOSED SEALED MOTION (Selected Participants Only)by Snayha M. Nath (available to: Respondent Larry Blakney, Petitioner United States of America), #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 06/10/20, Forensic Report (ECF No. 52), #2 02/24/21, Forensic Report (ECF No. 59), #3 06/24/21, Forensic Report (ECF No. 67), #4 07/16/21, Forensic Report (ECF No. 74)) (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Larry Blakney. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 12 PROPOSED SEALED MOTION (Selected Participants Only)by Snayha M. Nath (available to: Respondent Larry Blakney, Petitioner United States of America). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Snayha M. Nath on behalf of Larry Blakney. (Nath, Snayha) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Evaluation of Respondent Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4246(b) filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 9 Notice filed by United States of America Notice of Finding Regarding Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial. (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Respondent's Mental Health Examiner as to Dr. Hans Stelmach (Craven, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph H. Craven on behalf of Larry Blakney. (Craven, Joseph) |
Filing 6
ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender to represent respondent, appointing mental health examiner, and granting #4 motion to seal. Counsel for respondent is DIRECTED to file any necessary response to the motion to stay within 21 days of this order. The government may file any necessary reply thereto within 14 days of service of the response. The court ORDERS that the parties file any future forensic evaluations or other psychological or psychiatric documents in this case under seal, whether such documents are produced by government evaluators, independent examiners appointed by order of this court, or other mental health professionals. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 7/28/2021. (Poole, A)
|
| Motion Submitted to Senior Judge W. Earl Britt regarding #4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial By Criminal Court filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 3 SEALED (Selected Participants Only) Forensic Report received as to Larry Blakney (available to: Respondent Larry Blakney, Petitioner United States of America). (Petre, Genna) Modified on 7/28/2021 to remove "proposed" (Poole, A). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Genna D Petre on behalf of United States of America. (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 1 Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4246 against Larry Blakney, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Blakney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Genna D Petre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Larry Blakney | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Craven |
| Represented By: | Snayha M. Nath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
