Johnson v. Scarantino et al
| Shawn M. Johnson |
| Warden Scarantino, Warden Ramo, Asst. Warden Roberson and Captain Martin |
| 5:2022ct03041 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., on 1/27/2022. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and Inmate Account Supervisor at McDowell - F.C.I. (Poole, A)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via U.S. Mail to Shawn M. Johnson at McDowell - F.C.I. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Shawn M. Johnson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Shawn M. Johnson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (missing page 4) against Captain Martin, Warden Ramo, Asst. Warden Roberson and Warden Scarantino filed by Shawn M. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Poole, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
