Watson v. Thomas et al
| Darius Watson |
| Charlie Thomas, Martin Wasielewski, Rebecca Brigman and Field Specialist Neal |
| 5:2022ct03132 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Darius Watson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 5
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/14/2022. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff at New Hanover County Jail. (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for initial review. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Darius Watson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Darius Watson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rebecca Brigman, Field Specialist Neal, Charlie Thomas and Martin Wasielewski filed by Darius Watson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
