Meyers v. United States of America
| David Meyers |
| United States of America |
| 5:2022ct03135 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Relief, Motion for Injunction, Motion for Show Cause Order, Motion for Court Order to Forth the Issue Ordering Scotland Correctional Institute Wardens to Cease and Desist They're Obstruction of Justice and Obstruction of U.S. Mail to and from the Honorable Court and Motion for Enlargement of Time and a Request for 90 days Extension of Time and for a Court Order to be allowed to obtain Postage Stamps from the Prison Canteen to Mail my Pleadings and the courts complaint for to the court filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Relief filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 9
ORDER - The court, in its discretion: DEEMS plaintiff's May 19, 2022, motion a timely response to the order of deficiency; GRANTS IN PART the motion to the extent plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court's prior order dismissing the action for failure to prosecute [D.E. 6]; DENIES as premature the motion for a hearing [D.E. 7]; GRANTS IN PART the motion seeking to reopen the case [D.E. 8]; and DIRECTS the clerk to re-open the case and to send plaintiff both the forms for filing an FTCA complaint and an application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The court further: DIRECTS plaintiff, not later than June 27, 2022, to file his complaint on the correct forms and to either file the application to proceed without prepayment of fees, or pay the filing fee; and WARNS plaintiff that, if he fails to comply with this order within the time provided, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/27/2022. Copy of order and forms sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for Relief for case to be reopened filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #8 MOTION for Relief for case to be reopened. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Requesting Permission to Speak with the Court filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #7 MOTION Requesting Permission to Speak with the Court. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration regarding #4 Order Dismissing Case filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #6 MOTION for Reconsideration regarding #4 Order Dismissing Case,. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/17/2022. Copy of judgment and notice of appeal rights sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
|
Filing 4
Order Dismissing Case. The court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the action [D.E. 1] for failure to prosecute, and DIRECTS the clerk to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 5/16/2022. Copy of order sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for deficiency review. (Lopez, R.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - The papers in the above captioned matter are deficient in the following respects: 1) You must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected papers within twenty-one (21) days from the filing of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/19/2022. Copy of order and form sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Responses due by 5/10/2022.) (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America filed by David Meyers. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meyers v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Meyers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
