Hayat v. Justice et al
| Adam Hayat |
| Counselor Justice and Counselor Anderson |
| 5:2022ct03185 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/7/2022. Copy of judgment and notice of appellate rights sent via US Mail to Adam Hayat at Butner - F.M.C. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4
Order Dismissing Case without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 7/7/2022. Copy sent via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding order of deficiency. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. The complaint is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND you must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Responses due by 6/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 6/8/2022. Copy of order and forms sent via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Plaintiff at Butner FMC. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (in letter form) against Counselor Anderson and Counselor Justice filed by Adam Hayat. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
