Moore v. United States of America
Dennis Steward Moore |
United States of America and J.D. Rattelade |
5:2022ct03228 |
July 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/3/2022. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and Berlin FCI via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Dennis Steward Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Dennis Steward Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT (on the form) against J.D. Rattelade, United States of America, filed by Dennis Steward Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #4 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (in letter form) against United States of America filed by Dennis Steward Moore. (Attachment: #1 Court Order) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.