White v. Hardee et al
Leonzo L. White |
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and Rhonda Hendricks |
5:2022ct03296 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/2/2022. Copy of judgment and notice of appeal rights sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 2 Order Dismissing Case. Because plaintiff did not timely pay the filing fee or file an individual application to proceed without prepayment of fees, the court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the action for failure to prosecute and DIRECTS the clerk to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 9/2/2022. Copy of order sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for deficiency review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Food Service Supervisor, Michael A. Hardee, Rhonda Hendricks, Unit Management filed by Leonzo L. White. (Attachments: #1 Supplement to Complaint, #2 Envelope, #3 Court Order) (Poole, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.