Thompson v. Trump et al
| Brandon E. Thompson |
| Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden |
| 5:2022ct03373 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/18/2022. Copy to plaintiff and to NC Department of Public Safety. (Castania, M)
|
| Filing 4 Letter to plaintiff regarding filing of complaint and enclosing notice regarding privacy issues. (Castania, M) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for frivolity review. As soon as the screening is concluded, an order will issue and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Docket sheet mailed to plaintiff.) (Castania, M) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Castania, M) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon E. Thompson. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Brandon E. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Biden and Donald J. Trump filed by Brandon E. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
