D.R. et al v. Wake County Board of Education
| Aaliyah Redmond, Derisha Redmond, A.R. and D.R. |
| Wake County Board of Education |
| 5:2022cv00045 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Memorandum in Support regarding #14 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Wake County Board of Education. (Stagner, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Wake County Board of Education. (Stagner, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #2 Complaint filed by Wake County Board of Education. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Stagner, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 12
Financial Disclosure Statement by Wake County Board of Education (Stagner, Deborah)
|
|
Filing 11
Notice of Appearance filed by Deborah R. Stagner on behalf of Wake County Board of Education. (Stagner, Deborah)
|
|
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #2 Complaint. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #13 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Defendant has up to and including March 14, 2022, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #2 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 2/17/2022. (Hockaday, A.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Use Pseudonym. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/9/2022. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #3 First MOTION regarding #2 Complaint, #1 Complaint for Leave to Use Pseudonym. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 9
Proposed Order regarding #3 First MOTION regarding #2 Complaint, #1 Complaint for Leave to Use Pseudonym filed by A.R., D.R.. (Harris, Neubia)
|
|
Second Notice to Counsel regarding: #3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(b)(3) and Section V(I)(3) of the CM/ECF Policy and Procedures Manual and Judge Dever's practice preferences, parties must file a proposed order with any non-dispositive motion. Please file a proposed order using the event 'Proposed Order' in the Responses and Replies category and link it back to the motion to which it corresponds. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Wake County Board of Education. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of Appearance filed by Neubia L. Harris on behalf of A.R., D.R.. (Harris, Neubia)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice filed by A.R., D.R. regarding #2 Complaint Summons. (Harris, Neubia)
|
|
Filing 5
Financial Disclosure Statement filed by A.R., D.R. regarding #2 Complaint Financial Disclosure Form. (Harris, Neubia) Modified on 2/1/2022 - Clarified docket text. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice - Civil Cover Sheet filed by A.R., D.R. regarding #2 Complaint, Notice of Deficiency. (Harris, Neubia)
|
|
Notice to Counsel - No Summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel failed to flatten the PDF after creating it as required pursuant to Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Counsel is directed to date, sign and refile the document making sure to comply with the rule using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.)
|
|
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to A.R., D.R. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Notice to Counsel - When Counsel is filing documents that pertains to a minor, Counsel should abide by Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and "F" of the Policy and Procedures Manual found on the Clerk's website. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Notice to Counsel regarding: #3 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(b)(3) and Section V(I)(3) of the CM/ECF Policy and Procedures Manual and Judge Dever's practice preferences, parties must file a proposed order with any non-dispositive motion. Please file a proposed order using the event 'Proposed Order' in the Responses and Replies category and link it back to the motion to which it corresponds. (Sellers, N.)
|
|
Filing 3
First MOTION regarding #2 Complaint, #1 Complaint for Leave to Use Pseudonym filed by A.R., D.R. (Harris, Neubia) Modified on 1/31/2022 to take out the names of the plaintiffs. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Wake County Board of Education ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6411657.), filed by A.R., D.R. (Harris, Neubia) Modified on 1/31/2022 to clarify docket entry and to take out plaintiffs names. (Rudd, D.)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET SEE DE #2 FOR COMPLAINT against Wake County Board of Education ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6411657.), filed by A.R., D.R. (Harris, Neubia) Modified on 1/31/2022 to clarify docket entry and to take out the names of the plaintiffs. (Rudd, D.) (Main Document 1 flattened and replaced on 2/1/2022) (Edwards, S.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
