Ford v. US Government
| Sarah Ford |
| US Government |
| 5:2022cv00156 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #8 MOTION to Admit Evidence. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support regarding #8 MOTION to Admit Evidence filed by Sarah Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Medical Records, Doctor's Notes, and Police Reports, #2 Low Back Pain, #3 Advent Health ER Record, #4 Prescription Instructions, #5 Medical and Prescription Care Instructions, #6 Invoice, #7 Baycare ED Documents, #8 Appointment Confirmation, #9 Exhibit B - Emails and Police Reports, #10 DOD Complaint, #11 Email Correspondence 11/17/2021, #12 FBI Tips) (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Admit Evidence filed by Sarah Ford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Waddell, K.) |
| Motion Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #6 MOTION for Discovery. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support regarding #6 MOTION for Discovery, filed by Sarah Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Claim Amendment) (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Discovery, filed by Sarah Ford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Waddell, K.) |
| M&R Submitted to Chief US District Judge Richard E. Myers II regarding #4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against US Government, filed by Sarah Ford. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court grants Ford's IFP motion (D.E. 1), but recommends that the court dismiss this matter without prejudice or, alternatively, allow Ford to amend her complaint to add the missing information. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendation are due by 5/18/2022. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II on 5/4/2022. (Copy of order sent to Sarah Ford412 Hudson Ct., Cary, NC 27511 via US Mail.) (Waddell, K.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Waddell, K.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Sarah Ford. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Sarah Ford. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Sarah Ford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ford v. US Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Ford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: US Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
