Pen-Tech Associates, Inc. v. Kang et al
Pen-Tech Associates, Inc. |
Daniel Kang, Michael Kim, The Game Lab, LLC, Hung Nguyen, Mateo Perez and 4D Amusement, LLC |
5:2022cv00227 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MOTION for Entry of Default against Defendants The Game Lab, LLC; Mateo Perez; and 4D Amusement, LLC filed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service The Game Lab, LLC, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service Mateo Perez, #3 Exhibit C - Proof of Service 4D Amusement, LLC, #4 Text of Proposed Order) (George, Charles) |
Filing 15 Financial Disclosure Statement by Daniel Kang (Graebe, J.) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Daniel Kang answer due 8/10/2022. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/12/2022. (Sellers, N.) |
Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance filed by J. William Graebe on behalf of Daniel Kang. (Graebe, J.) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by John T. Kivus on behalf of Daniel Kang. (Kivus, John) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Daniel Kang. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order granting Consent Motion) (Jackson, John) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by John Christopher Jackson on behalf of Daniel Kang. (Jackson, John) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. 4D Amusement, LLC served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (George, Charles) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. Mateo Perez served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (George, Charles) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. The Game Lab, LLC served on 6/20/2022, answer due 7/11/2022. (George, Charles) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. Daniel Kang served on 6/20/2022, answer due 7/11/2022. (George, Charles) |
Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 4D Amusement, LLC, Daniel Kang, Michael Kim, Hung Nguyen, Mateo Perez, The Game Lab, LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 TRADEMARK REPORT: Copy of report and complaint forwarded to Mail Stop 8, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 via US Mail on June 7, 2022. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc. (George, Charles) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Charles George on behalf of Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. (George, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6587400.), filed by Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Trademark Electronic Search System, #3 Proposed Summons Daniel Kang, #4 Proposed Summons Michael Kim, #5 Proposed Summons The Game Lab, LLC, #6 Proposed Summons Hung Nguyen, #7 Proposed Summons Mateo Perez, #8 Proposed Summons 4D Amusement, LLC) (George, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.