Thomas et al v. Jaddou
| Prethesh Joseph Thomas and Ammu Maria Francis |
| Ur Jaddou |
| 5:2022cv00271 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ammu Maria Francis, Prethesh Joseph Thomas as to Ur Jaddou, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Lopez, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Civil Process Clerk, Attorney General. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Carlos Andres Lopez on behalf of Ammu Maria Francis, Prethesh Joseph Thomas. (Lopez, Carlos) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Ammu Maria Francis (Lopez, Carlos) |
| Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Prethesh Joseph Thomas (Lopez, Carlos) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0417-6635310.), filed by Prethesh Joseph Thomas, Ammu Maria Francis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Lopez, Carlos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
