United States of America v. Mills
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES and United States of America
Defendant: Mark Mills
Case Number: 5:2022cv00298
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Appointing Mediator Rene Stemple Trehy. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/29/2023. (Horton, B.)
February 24, 2023 SECOND NOTICE TO COUNSEL - Pursuant to Local ADR Rule 101.1c(a), counsel is reminded that the parties must file a written statement identifying an agreed upon mediator within twenty one (21) days of the entry of the Scheduling Order. If a statement is not timely filed, the Clerk of Court will appoint a mediator from the list of court certified mediators. Selection of Mediator should have been electronically filed on or before 12/14/2022. (Collins, S.)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery in this case may be governed by a protective order. Discovery due by 5/5/23. Mediation Deadline set for 5/19/23. Motions due by 6/9/23. The parties should review the attached order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/23/22. (Collins, S.)
November 23, 2022 NOTICE TO COUNSEL - Pursuant to Local ADR Rule 101.1c(a), counsel is reminded that the parties must file a written statement identifying an agreed upon mediator within twenty one (21) days of the entry of the Scheduling Order. If a statement is not timely filed, the Clerk of Court will appoint a mediator from the list of court certified mediators. Selection of Mediator must be electronically filed on or before 12/14/2022. (Collins, S.)
November 17, 2022 Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Report (joint) filed by United States of America. (Morton, Benton)
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING - Discovery Plan due by 11/18/22. Counsel should read attached order in its entirety for critical information and deadlines. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/14/22. (Collins, S.)
September 30, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mark Mills. (Moyer, Justin)
September 1, 2022 Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by Mark Mills (Moyer, Justin)
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint filed by Mark Mills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order) (Moyer, Justin)
August 31, 2022 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Justin Paul Moyer on behalf of Mark Mills. (Moyer, Justin)
August 31, 2022 Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer regarding #1 Complaint. (Collins, S.)
August 31, 2022 TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time #5 . For good cause shown, it is ordered that Defendant has up to and including September 30, 2022, within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint #1 . Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 8/31/2022. (Hockaday, A.)
August 31, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Mark Mills. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Collins, S.)
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Benton T. Morton on behalf of United States of America. (Morton, Benton)
August 12, 2022 SECOND Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Collins, S.)
August 5, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mark Mills. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.)
August 5, 2022 Notice to Counsel - Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.)
August 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Mills, filed by UNITED STATES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Morton, Benton)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Benton T. Morton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Benton T. Morton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Mills
Represented By: Justin Paul Moyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?