Sleem v. United States Federal Government et al
| Kevin Sleem |
| United States Federal Government, United States Department of Education, UNC Chapel Hill, Florida Atlantic University and Durham Technical Community College |
| 5:2022cv00355 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin Sleem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Kevin Sleem, #4 Exhibit 2 Affidavit of Kevin Sleem, #5 Exhibit 3 Correspondence 2.1.21, #6 Exhibit 4 Correspondence 1.5.22, #7 Exhibit 5 Summary of Events, #8 Exhibit 6 Residential Rental Contract Renewal, #9 Exhibit 7 Correspondence 9.1.22, #10 Exhibit 8 Supplemental Summary, #11 Exhibit 9 Final Judgment (FL - Case No. 502009DR002288XXXXSB), #12 Exhibit 10 Trespass Warning, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Proposed Summons) (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Kevin Sleem. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Kevin Sleem (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff to the Court regarding changes to the original proposed complaint. (McNally, Kimberly) |
Filing 2
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - Plaintiff is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected documents within fourteen (14) days from the filing of this order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/9/2022. A copy of this Order and blank forms sent via US mail to Kevin Sleem at 3528 Turnberry Circle, Faytteville, NC 28303 (Collins, S.)
|
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Kevin Sleem. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Kevin Sleem. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Attachment to Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Kevin Sleem dated 8/4/2021, #4 Exhibit 2- Affidavit of Kevin Sleem regarding Durham Tech, #5 Exhibit 3- Letter to Kevin Slem sent via email from Durham Tech dated 2/1/2021, #6 Exhibit 4- Letter dated 1/5/22 from Carolina Outreach to Durham Technical Community College, #7 Exhibit 5- Supporting document to complaint regarding Durham Tech Events, #8 Exhibit 6- Residential Renta Contract Renewal and/or Amendment, #9 Exhibit 7- Residential Rental Contract, #10 Exhibit 8- Supporting document to complaint, #11 Cover letter, #12 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
