Sauer v. Stanley
| Donald Fredrick Sauer and Don F. Sauer |
| Drew Stanley |
| 5:2022hc02002 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice as successive. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/1/2022. Copy of judgment and notice of appellate rights sent via US Mail to Donald Fredrick Sauer at Nash Correctional Institution. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3
Order Dismissing Case. The court DISMISSES Sauer's habeas petition without prejudice as successive. Sauer must obtain authorization from the Fourth Circuit before filing this application. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/28/2022. Copy sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to petitioner at Nash Correctional. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number RAL089373) filed by Donald Fredrick Sauer. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for petition review. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
