United States of America v. Giffen
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: Todd Michael Giffen
Case Number: 5:2022hc02006
Filed: January 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Earl Britt
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2022 Filing 8 SEALED (Selected Participants Only)Forensic Report received as to Todd Michael Giffen (available to: Respondent Todd Michael Giffen, Petitioner United States of America). (Petre, Genna) Modified to remove "proposed" on 2/24/2022 (Poole, A).
January 13, 2022 Filing 7 Notice of Respondent's Mental Health Examiner as to Dr. Hans Stelmach (Allen, Sonya)
January 13, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Sonya M. Allen on behalf of Todd Michael Giffen. (Allen, Sonya)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender to represent respondent and appointing mental health examiner. The court will set this matter for hearing upon receipt of the psychiatric or psychological report prepared pursuant to 4247(c). GRANTING #4 Motion to Seal and the court ORDERS that the parties file any future forensic evaluations or other psychological or psychiatric documents in this case under seal, whether such documents are produced by government evaluators, independent examiners appointed by order of this court, or other mental health professionals. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 1/12/2022. (Poole, A)
January 5, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna)
January 5, 2022 Filing 3 SEALED (Selected Participants Only)Forensic Report received as to Todd Michael Giffen (available to: Respondent Todd Michael Giffen, Petitioner United States of America). (Petre, Genna) Modified to remove "proposed" on 1/12/2022 (Poole, A).
January 5, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Genna D Petre on behalf of United States of America. (Petre, Genna)
January 5, 2022 Filing 1 Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4246(a) against Todd Michael Giffen, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna)
January 5, 2022 Motion Submitted to Senior Judge W. Earl Britt regarding #4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report. (Poole, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Giffen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Genna D Petre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Todd Michael Giffen
Represented By: Sonya M. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?