United States of America v. Das
| United States of America |
| Nelash Das |
| 5:2022hc02026 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| W Earl Britt |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice of Respondent's Mental Health Examiner as to Dr. Hans Stelmach (Craven, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Joseph H. Craven on behalf of Nelash Das. (Craven, Joseph) |
Filing 6
ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender to represent respondent and appointing mental health examiner. Counsel for respondent is DIRECTED to file any necessary response to the motion to stay within 21 days of this order. The government may file any necessary reply thereto within 14 days of service of the response. Granting #4 and the court ORDERS that the parties file any future forensic evaluations or other psychological or psychiatric documents in this case under seal, whether such documents are produced by government evaluators, independent examiners appointed by order of this court, or other mental health professionals. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 2/10/2022. (Poole, A)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 3 SEALED (Selected Participants Only)Forensic Report received as to Nelash Das (available to: Respondent Nelash Das, Petitioner United States of America). (Petre, Genna) Modified to remove proposed on 2/10/2022 (Poole, A). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Genna D Petre on behalf of United States of America. (Petre, Genna) |
| Filing 1 Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4246(a) against Nelash Das, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Mental Disease or Defect and Dangerousness, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Petre, Genna) |
| Motion Submitted to Senior Judge W. Earl Britt regarding #4 MOTION to Seal Document #3 PROPOSED SEALED Forensic Report, #5 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Respondent's Competency to Stand Trial by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. (Poole, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Das | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Genna D Petre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Nelash Das | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Craven |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
