Gordon v. United States of America
| Arthur Lorenzo Gordon |
| United States of America |
| 5:2022hc02107 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response due by 8/25/2022. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/26/2022. Copy of order sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Ward, Merrill) Modified on 7/26/2022 - to correct docket text. (Lopez, R.). |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Merrill E Ward on behalf of United States of America. (Ward, Merrill) |
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 5 Letter sent to U.S. Attorney with Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answers due by 7/26/2022. (Copy of letter sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CONTINUE MANAGEMENT OF CASE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II on 7/5/2022. Copy of order sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. Once a review has completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing fee Paid: $ 5, receipt number RAL092595. (Lopez, R.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY. The papers in the above captioned matter are deficient in the following respects: The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Petitioner is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected papers within twenty-one (21) days from the filing of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 6/21/2022. Copy of order and form sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Responses due by 7/12/2022.) (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Arthur Lorenzo Gordon. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gordon v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Arthur Lorenzo Gordon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Merrill E Ward |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
