McNeill v. Ramos et al
| Demetrios Donell McNeill |
| Warden R. Ramos and United States of America |
| 5:2022hc02134 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Robert B Jones |
| Richard E Myers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number RAL093462 (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY. The papers in the above captioned matter are deficient in the following respects: 1) The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Petitioner is DIRECTED to correct the deficiencies listed above and return the corrected papers within twenty-one (21) days from the filing of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/1/2022. Copy of the order and form sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Responses due by 8/22/2022.) (Lopez, R.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Demetrios Donell McNeill. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Documents in Support, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
