Kurek v. State of North Carolina
| Thomas Edward Kurek |
| State of North Carolina |
| 5:2022hc02165 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Rule 12 Letter Issued to Thomas Edward Kurek as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds. Response due by 1/18/2023. Copy sent via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Support regarding #10 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds filed by State of North Carolina. (Attachments: #1 Detailed List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1.Petitioners July 9, 2021 contempt order, #3 Exhibit 2.Petitioners October 7, 2021 Motion, #4 Exhibit 3.Court order dismissing Petitioners October 7 Motion, #5 Exhibit 4. North Carolina Department of Public Safetys policy regarding Offender Use of Mail) (Hayes, Caden) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds filed by State of North Carolina. (Hayes, Caden) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for an Order to Show Cause filed by Thomas Edward Kurek. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Caden William Hayes on behalf of State of North Carolina. (Hayes, Caden) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Thomas Edward Kurek requesting the status of the case. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Courtesy copy of docket sheet sent via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 6 Letter sent to NC Attorney General's Office with Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answers due by 12/28/2022. (Poole, A) |
Filing 5
ORDER - The court GRANTS petitioner's application to proceed in form.a pauperis #2 , and DISMISSES all claims other than petitioner's challenge to his incarceration pursuant to a civil contempt order. The clerk shall maintain management of the action and serve the North Carolina Attorney General with the petition. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever, III on 11/18/2022. Copy of order sent to petitioner via U.S. Mail. (Poole, A)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for petition review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to petitioner at Carteret County Detention Center. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Thomas Edward Kurek. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thomas Edward Kurek. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Edward Kurek. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kurek v. State of North Carolina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Edward Kurek | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of North Carolina | |
| Represented By: | Caden William Hayes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
