Joyner v. Turley et al
| Nathaniel L. Joyner and Nathaniel Lee Joyner |
| Captain Turley, Sergeant Riddick, Daniel Everett and Dr. Evans |
| 5:2023ct03019 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter from Nathaniel L. Joyner regarding the lack of supplies available in the prison. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 5
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 1/20/2023. Copy sent via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff. (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for initial review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Nathaniel L. Joyner. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Nathaniel L. Joyner. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. Evans, Daniel Everett, Sergeant Riddick and Captain Turley filed by Nathaniel L. Joyner. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
