Carrington v. Allen et al
Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr. |
Sonya M. Allen and Office of the Federal Public Defender |
5:2023ct03114 |
April 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Lopez, R.) |
Motion Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees.****Case Submitted to District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan for initial review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 4 Order (Prison Litigation Reform Act) Response to Order due by 5/8/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 4/17/2023. Copy of order sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sonya M. Allen and Office of the Federal Public Defender filed by Theodore Macon Carrington, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.