Allen v. Sheriff of Beaufort County
| Markis Rasaan Allen and Markis R. Allen |
| Unnamed Defendant, Sheriff of Beaufort County, Warden of Central Prison, Warden of Granville Correctional, Billy O. Cooper, Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll, Edith M. Greene, Eldridge Walker, Case Manager Allen, Bryan T. Harris, D.C.C. Board, Medical Staff at Central Prison and Sheriff of Wake County |
| 5:2023ct03190 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Robert B Jones |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER - GRANTING #7 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 7/24/2023. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Order regarding #5 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Markis Rasaan Allen. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #4 MOTION to Dismiss. Case also submitted for initial review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement as to Markis Rasaan Allen. (Powers, S.) |
| Filing 9 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Powers, S.) |
|
Filing 8
Order (Prison Litigation Reform Act) Response to Order due by 8/10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 7/20/2023. Copy of Order sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. (Powers, S.)
|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #7 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Powers, S.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Markis Rasaan Allen. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 6 CORRECTED COMPLAINT (on the form) against Sheriff of Beaufort County, Warden of Central Prison, Warden of Granville Correctional, Billy O. Cooper, Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll, Edith M. Greene, Eldridge Walker, Case Manager Allen, Bryan T. Harris, D.C.C. Board, Medical Staff at Central Prison and Sheriff of Wake County filed by Markis Rasaan Allen. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) Copy sent with postage provided. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - DENYING #1 Motion to Appoint Counsel and DIRECTS plaintiff to clarify whether he seeks voluntary dismissal of his entire action. Plaintiff shall have until July 25, 2023, to file a response. If plaintiff fails to respond, the clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the action without prejudice without further order of the court. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 7/11/2023. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION (in letter form) for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Markis Rasaan Allen. (Attachment: #1 Envelopes) (Indig, A.) |
| Motions Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #1 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and #4 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal. (Indig, A.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER of Deficiency. The complaint is not on the forms prescribed for use by this court AND you must either file an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit or pay $402.00. Responses due by 7/17/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 6/26/2023. Copy of order and forms sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Markis Rasaan Allen. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
