Waters v. Coleman et al
William Charles Waters |
Ernie Coleman, Scott Hammonds, Lt. M. Ormond, Captain S. Satchel, Major Jeremy Hewitt, Clee Atkins, Lt. Ptman, Lt. Cohen and Sgt. S. Stalls |
5:2023ct03205 |
July 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 7/20/2023. Copy of Order sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Copy sent to the Inmate Account Supervisor via US Mail. (Powers, S.) |
Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever, III for initial review. (Powers, S.) |
Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by William Charles Waters. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by William Charles Waters. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clee Atkins, Lt. Cohen, Ernie Coleman, Scott Hammonds, Jeremy Hewitt, M. Ormond, Lt. Ptman, S. Satchel and S. Stalls filed by William Charles Waters. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.