Riethmiller v. GBR Pizza Inc
Plaintiff: Annamarie Riethmiller
Defendant: GBR Pizza Inc
Case Number: 5:2023cv00043
Filed: January 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: James C Dever
Referring Judge: Robert T Numbers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Plaintiff shall tender to the Clerk of Court the filing fee of $402.00 or submit an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit no later than April 10, 2023. The court also DIRECTS plaintiff to correct the filing deficiencies, by filing a financial disclosure statement, a notice of self-representation, and provide proposed summons for all necessary parties for service of this action not later than April 10, 2023. If the plaintiff fails to file a response to this order in the allotted time, the clerk shall close the case without further order from the court. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 3/15/2023. Copy and forms sent via US Mail to Annamarie Riethmiller at 1009 Delma Grimes Rd, Coats, NC 27521. (Mann, Stephanie)
February 22, 2023 Filing 3 Document: Statement by the Ex Parte Plaintiff filed by Annamarie Riethmiller. (Attachments: #1 GBR Pizza Company Cars Usage Policy, #2 Filing Sheet, #3 Envelope) (Mann, Stephanie)
February 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER regarding deficiencies. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 2/9/2023. Sent to Annamarie Riethmiller at 1009 Delma Grimes Rd. Coats, NC 27521 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)
February 8, 2023 Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for review of deficiencies. (Sellers, N.)
February 8, 2023 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.)
February 8, 2023 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Annamarie Riethmiller. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.)
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GBR Pizza Inc. (No Filing fee Paid), filed by Annamarie Riethmiller. (Attachments: #1 Letter to GBR Pizza, #2 Addendum to letter of 1/30/2023, #3 Request for Intervention/Mediation, #4 Affidavit of Annamarie Riethmiller, #5 Filing Sheet) (Rudd, D.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riethmiller v. GBR Pizza Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annamarie Riethmiller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GBR Pizza Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?