Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.
| Oak Grove Technologies, LLC |
| InVeris Training Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Meggitt Training Systems, Inc. and InVeris Training Solutions, Inc. |
| 5:2023cv00057 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Robert B Jones |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #10 MOTION to Vacate. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion regarding #10 MOTION to Vacate filed by InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.. (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Order regarding #10 MOTION to Vacate filed by InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.. (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE regarding #9 Answer to Complaint Reply to Response in Opposition to Petition to Confirm filed by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Rothrock, Mark) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition regarding #10 MOTION to Vacate filed by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Rothrock, Mark) |
| Notice to Counsel: This is a notice regarding docket entry #10 in the above-captioned case. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(b)(3) and Section V(I)(3) of the CM/ECF Policy and Procedures Manual and Judge Dever's practice preferences, parties must file a proposed order with any non-dispositive motion. Please file a proposed order to the motion at docket entry #10 using the event 'Proposed Order' in the Responses and Replies category and link it back to the motion to which it corresponds. Please also note that the Memorandum in Support should be filed separately using the Memorandum in Support event located under the Responses and Replies category, linking back to the motion to which it corresponds. No need to re-file the Memorandum in Support at this time. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 13
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/3/2023. (Mann, Stephanie)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance filed by Mark Montgomery Rothrock on behalf of Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Rothrock, Mark) |
| Filing 11 Financial Disclosure Statement by InVeris Training Solutions, Inc. (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Vacate filed by InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate) (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award ANSWER to Complaint by InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.. (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Margaret Louise Booz on behalf of InVeris Training Solutions, Inc.. (Booz, Margaret) |
| Filing 7 Notice filed by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC regarding #4 Amended Document, Exhibit A - Subcontract Agreement. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subcontract Agreement) (Armbruster, John) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to InVeris Training Solutions, Inc. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - All Counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #3 Financial Disclosure Statement, [4-1] Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the financial disclosure statement and the civil cover sheet) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Notice to Counsel - Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documents. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by John Mitchell Armbruster on behalf of Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Armbruster, John) |
| Filing 4 CORRECTED Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award AMENDED DOCUMENT by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. Amendment to #1 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A- Subcontract Agreement, #4 Exhibit B- American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Tribunal - Final Award) (Ortiz, David) Modified on 2/9/2023 to reflect that this is the corrected filing and to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) (Attachment 1 flattened and replaced on 2/10/2023) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC (Ortiz, David) (Main Document 3 flattened and replaced on 2/10/2023) (Edwards, S.). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by David Ransom Ortiz on behalf of Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Ortiz, David) |
| Filing 1 CORRECTED AND REFILED at #4 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against InVeris Training Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Meggitt Training Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-6933191), filed by Oak Grove Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Subcontract Agreement, #2 Exhibit B- American Arbitration Association Commercial Arbitration Tribunal - Final Award) (Ortiz, David) Modified on 2/9/2023 to clarify the title of document and to describe exhibits. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
