Shavin v. Precision Franchising, Inc.
Abraham Shavin |
Precision Franchising, Inc. |
5:2023cv00169 |
April 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Brian S Meyers |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Order Redesignating Division to Southern Division. At the direction of the Court, and for the continued efficient administration of justice, the above-captioned case is redesignated as a Southern Division case. The Honorable James C. Dever III, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 7:23-cv-822-D-BM. No further filing shall be made in 5:23-cv-169-D-BM. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/6/2023. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance filed by Charlotte Smith on behalf of All Defendants. (Smith, Charlotte) |
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by Kevin Scott Joyner on behalf of All Defendants. (Joyner, Kevin) |
Filing 8 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Abraham Shavin. Precision Franchising, Inc. waiver sent on 4/6/2023, answer due 6/5/2023. (Brady, Scott) |
Filing 7 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Philip Bohrer on behalf of Abraham Shavin. (Bohrer, Philip) |
Filing 6 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Scott E. Brady on behalf of Abraham Shavin. (Brady, Scott) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Southern Division. New case number 7:23-cv-822-D-BM. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 Notice filed by Abraham Shavin regarding #1 Complaint, Notice of Deficiency JS44 Civil Cover Sheet. (Philbeck, J. Heydt) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Southern division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order correcting the error. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint - Counsel failed to file a JS44 Civil Cover Sheet as required by the Court. Counsel should file a Cover Sheet using the event "Notice-Other" as soon as possible. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 4 Notice filed by Abraham Shavin regarding #1 Complaint 's proposed Summons. (Philbeck, J. Heydt) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Abraham Shavin (Philbeck, J. Heydt) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by J. Heydt Philbeck on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Philbeck, J. Heydt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7021813.), filed by Abraham Shavin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Plaintiff consent) (Philbeck, J. Heydt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shavin v. Precision Franchising, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Abraham Shavin | |
Represented By: | J. Heydt Philbeck |
Represented By: | Philip Bohrer |
Represented By: | Scott E. Brady |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Precision Franchising, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Charlotte Smith |
Represented By: | Kevin Scott Joyner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.