United States of America v. $121,675.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $121,675.00 in U.S. Currency |
| Issam Ahmad |
| 5:2023cv00223 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Robert B Jones |
| Richard E Myers |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 Civil Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLAIM Verified by Issam Ahmad. (Pruden, William) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by William C. Pruden on behalf of Issam Ahmad. (Pruden, William) |
| Filing 5 Process Receipt and Return - Funds is USMS custody on 5/10/2023. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT of Arrest and Notice in rem issued by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Document Referred: #2 Notice Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Matthew Lee Fesak on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Fesak, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Notice Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Fesak, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Forfeiture In Rem against $121,675.00 in U.S. Currency, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of SA Matthew T. Greer, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fesak, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
