Roberts v. Daymark Recovery Services, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey Lynn Roberts |
| Daymark Recovery Services, Inc. and Granville County Sheriff's Department |
| 5:2023cv00246 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Robert B Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #17 MOTION to Dismiss. Response due by 7/24/2023. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (Litrenta, Michael) |
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion regarding #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Granville County Sheriff's Department. (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition regarding #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Daymark Recovery Services, Inc. answer due 6/29/2023. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/14/2023. Copy sent via US Mail to Jeffrey Lynn Roberts at 432 Landon Rd.,Angier, NC 27501 (Mann, Stephanie)
|
| Filing 13 Response in Opposition regarding #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1, a motion for extension of time must reflect the view of each opposing party, excluding incarcerated unrepresented parties, or the efforts to consult with any opposing parties to obtain their view. Counsel is directed to refile. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.. (Litrenta, Michael) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance filed by Michael S. Litrenta on behalf of Daymark Recovery Services, Inc.. (Litrenta, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response due by 6/18/2023. (Mann, Stephanie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/25/2023: #1 Rule 12 Letter) (Mann, Stephanie). |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support regarding #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Granville County Sheriff's Department. (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Granville County Sheriff's Department. (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 7 Financial Disclosure Statement by Granville County Sheriff's Department (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by James R. Morgan, Jr on behalf of Granville County Sheriff's Department. (Morgan, James) |
| Filing 5 Document: Statement of proof of mailed documents filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Daymark Recovery Services, Inc., Granville County Sheriff's Department. (Summons issued at intake). (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daymark Recovery Services, Inc., Granville County Sheriff's Department (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number 500003757.), filed by Jeffrey Lynn Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Another complaint with supporting information, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
