Pridgen et al v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Jerry Pridgen and Lanette Harper Pridgen
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 5:2023cv00254
Filed: May 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terrence W Boyle
Referring Judge: Kimberly A Swank
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2023 Remark - Case transferred from North Carolina Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:23-cv-03025, filed 06/21/2023. (Stouch, L.)
June 20, 2023 Case transferred to District of Northern California. File transmitted electronically. (Stouch, L.)
June 14, 2023 Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO - 403) - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vance Chhabria. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel, entered on 6/13/2023. (Stouch, L.)
June 2, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jerry Pridgen, Lanette Harper Pridgen. Monsanto Company served on 5/22/2023, answer due 6/12/2023. (Stevens, Lindsay)
May 17, 2023 Filing 6 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Lindsay S. Stevens on behalf of Jerry Pridgen, Lanette Harper Pridgen. (Stevens, Lindsay)
May 16, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.)
May 12, 2023 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Sarah B. Stump on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Stump, Sarah)
May 12, 2023 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Lanette Harper Pridgen (Stump, Sarah)
May 12, 2023 Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jerry Pridgen (Stump, Sarah)
May 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7083409.), filed by Jerry Pridgen, Lanette Harper Pridgen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Stump, Sarah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pridgen et al v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Pridgen
Represented By: Sarah B. Stump
Represented By: Lindsay S. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lanette Harper Pridgen
Represented By: Sarah B. Stump
Represented By: Lindsay S. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?