Lam v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Plaintiff: Waileung Henry Lam
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Case Number: 5:2023cv00265
Filed: May 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. It is therefore ORDERED that, no later than July 14, 2023, plaintiff shall file (i) an amended in forma pauperis application particularized as described in the court and (ii) a new proposed complaint with amendments as directed in the courts June 5, 2023 order. Failure by plaintiff to file the relevant amended in forma pauperis documentation and proposed complaint by July 14, 2023, may result in a recommendation by the undersigned to the presiding district judge that this case be dismissed in whole or in part for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers on 6/23/2023. A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Waileung Henry Lam at 1104-104 Cove Bridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27604 (Collins, S.)
June 22, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Waileung Henry Lam. (Collins, S.)
June 22, 2023 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File. (Collins, S.)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order to Particularize Complaint - Plaintiff shall file (i) an amended in forma pauperis application particularized as described above and (ii) a new proposed complaint with amendments no later than 6/19/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers on 6/5/2023. A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Waileung Henry Lam at 1104-104 Cove Bridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27604 (Collins, S.)
June 1, 2023 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Brian S. Meyers regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S.)
May 19, 2023 Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Waileung Henry Lam. (Sellers, N.)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Waileung Henry Lam. (Sellers, N.)
May 19, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Waileung Henry Lam. (Sellers, N.)
May 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, filed by Waileung Henry Lam. (Attachments: #1 Determination and Notice of Rights, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sellers, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lam v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waileung Henry Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?