Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 5:2023cv00269
Filed: May 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Robert B Jones
Referring Judge: Richard E Myers
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Ex Parte granting #4 Ex Parte Motion to Serve Subpoena. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 6/15/2023. (Copy of order mailed to Inez de Ondarza Simmons, 4030 Wake Forest Road, Suite 319, Raleigh, NC 27609.) (McNally, Kimberly)
June 15, 2023 Notice to Counsel regarding: #4 Ex Parte Motion. Counsel indicated the incorrect division. In future filings, please reference the Western Division in the case caption. No action by counsel required at this time. (McNally, Kimberly)
June 14, 2023 Filing 5 Memorandum in Support regarding #4 EX PARTE MOTION by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of David Williamson, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Patrick Paige, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Susan B Stalzer) (Simmons, Inez)
June 14, 2023 Filing 4 EX PARTE MOTION by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC . (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Ex Parte Order) (Simmons, Inez)
June 14, 2023 Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #4 EX PARTE MOTION by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC . (McNally, Kimberly)
May 24, 2023 Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Complaint. No Summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed. (McNally, Kimberly)
May 24, 2023 Notice to Counsel regarding: Exhibit A to #1 Complaint. Counsel did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). The case administrator has corrected the docket text. No further action by counsel is required. (McNally, Kimberly)
May 23, 2023 Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Simmons, Inez)
May 23, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Inez de Ondarza Simmons on behalf of Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Simmons, Inez)
May 23, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Strike 3 Holdings, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7102350.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - List of Works Infringe #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Simmons, Inez) Modified on 5/24/2023 to identify exhibit (McNally, Kimberly).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Inez de Ondarza Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?