Allen v. Raleigh-Durham International Airport et al
| Derrick Allen |
| Raleigh-Durham International Airport and G2 Secure Staffing |
| 5:2023cv00378 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A Swank regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S) |
| Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Derrick Allen. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Derrick Allen (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Derrick Allen. (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G2 Secure Staffing, Raleigh-Durham International Airport, filed by Derrick Allen. (Attachments: #1 ADP - Request for Information, #2 State of North Carolina Record Search, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons) (Sellers, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
