Slatton v. Kijakazi
Patricia Slatton |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
SSA-Office of General Counsel |
5:2023cv00447 |
August 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Robert B Jones |
Richard E Myers |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance filed by Wanda D. Mason on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. (Mason, Wanda) |
NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE SERVICE - This action is governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate office within the Social Security of the General Counsel and the United States Attorneys Office of this case and Plaintiffs complaint. No summons will issue. Defendants deadline to serve an answer or motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 is governed by Supplemental Rule 4. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by Patricia Slatton (Waller, Laura) |
Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Laura Beth Waller on behalf of Patricia Slatton. (Waller, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7221362.), filed by Patricia Slatton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Waller, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.