Polidi v. Mendel et al
Richard Polidi |
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee, Kimberly C. Weinreich, John Heaton, The United States of America, The United States Patent & Trademark Office, Kathi Vidal and John Does 1-10 |
5:2023cv00518 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Robert B Jones |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for Eastern District (issued at intake). (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 Letter Plaintiff regarding #4 Summons Issued and the responsibility to serve pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John Heaton, Michelle K. Lee, Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, The United States Patent & Trademark Office, Kathi Vidal, Kimberly C. Weinreich, and U.S. Attorney. (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Richard Polidi. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Richard Polidi. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number 5-00006228), filed by Richard Polidi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2023: #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.