Adams, II v. Speedway (North Carolina) LLC
| William Ronnie Adams, II |
| Speedway (North Carolina) LLC |
| 5:2023cv00562 |
| October 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance filed by David Ransom Ortiz on behalf of Speedway (North Carolina) LLC. (Ortiz, David) |
| Filing 8 Financial Disclosure Statement by Speedway (North Carolina) LLC identifying Corporate Parent 7-Eleven, Inc., Corporate Parent SEJ Asset Management & Investment Company, Corporate Parent Seven-Eleven Japan Co., Ltd., Corporate Parent Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. for Speedway (North Carolina) LLC. (Ceglowski, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Speedway (North Carolina) LLC. (Ceglowski, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance filed by Kevin Michael Ceglowski on behalf of Speedway (North Carolina) LLC. (Ceglowski, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Speedway (North Carolina) LLC. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.) |
| Filing 4 Notice filed by William Ronnie Adams, II . (Martin, David) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Notice of Appearance, #3 Financial Disclosure Statement. Counsel is reminded that the filing user must lock or flatten the PDF document. Failure to flatten documents may result in the clerks office issuing a notice of deficiency. Counsel should "flatten" (the notice of appearance and the financial disclosure statement) prior to attaching it in accordance with Section IV.B of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. No further action is needed. (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding [1-2] Proposed Summons. Counsel has failed to complete the proposed summons. Counsel should complete the summons and refile using the event "Notice-Other". (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement by William Ronnie Adams, II (Martin, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by David J. Martin on behalf of William Ronnie Adams, II. (Martin, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Speedway (North Carolina) LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCEDC-7302825.), filed by William Ronnie Adams, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Martin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams, II v. Speedway (North Carolina) LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Ronnie Adams, II | |
| Represented By: | David J. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Speedway (North Carolina) LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Michael Ceglowski |
| Represented By: | David Ransom Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
