McDaniel v. State of North Carolina et al
| Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel |
| State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, Mecklenbury County Superior Court Divisions 26A through H, Rowan County Superior Court Division 19C, Guilford County Superior Court Division 18, Estate of Richard Long Huffman, Jr., Michelle Feimster Bailey, Emily Jeffords Meister, James Douglas Grimes, Christopher J. Loebsack, Page D. Morgan, Frank Lane Williamson, Jamie Melissa Woods, Jonathon Todt, M. Anthony Burts, Carla Archie, Ty Hands, George Bell, Lisa Bell, Elizabeth Trosch, Anna Mills Wagoner, Magistrate Williams, Katrina Watson, Mitchell Woodard and North Carolina Department of Justice |
| 5:2023cv00697 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| James C Dever |
| Robert B Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Self-Representation (unsigned) filed by Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (Mann, Stephanie) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement (unsigned) filed by Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mann, Stephanie) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr.: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel and for a frivolity review. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 1/10/2024. (Mann, Stephanie)
|
| Motion Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III regarding #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Mann, Stephanie) |
| TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court and for the continued efficient administration of justice, this case is reassigned to United States District Judge James C. Dever III for all further proceedings. United States District Judge Terrence W. Boyle is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings should reflect the revised case number of 5:23-CV-697-D-RJ. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/9/2024. (Hockaday, A.) |
| Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Stouch, L.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. A party who is proceeding without an attorney shall file a notice of self representation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(b). (Rudd, D.) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
