Murphy v. Slagle et al
| Fred Murphy |
| Mike Slagle and Josh Stein |
| 5:2023hc02038 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Robert B Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Document: Affidavit of facts in the nature of personal concerns filed by Fred Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Document in support, #2 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
| Filing 6 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Fred Murphy. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Poole, A) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge Terrence W. Boyle for initial review. (Poole, A) |
Filing 4
ORDER of Deficiency. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Responses due by 3/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., on 2/13/2023. Copy of order and form sent to petitioner via U.S. Mail. (Poole, A)
|
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Fred Murphy at Mountain View Correctional Institution. (Poole, A) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Fred Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Fred Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Documents in support, #3 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
