Beltran v. Holzapfel
Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran and Hilario Mendoza Beltran |
Warden William Holzapfel |
5:2023hc02223 |
October 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Richard E Myers |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter regarding case opening sent to petitioner via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Northern. Case Number 9:23-cv-00929. transfer order and docket sheet obtained from transferring district. |
Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Courtesy copy of docket sheet sent to petitioner via US Mail.) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that Petitioner's IFP Application, Dkt. No. #4 , is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Petitioner's action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina; and it is further ORDERED, given the significant liberty interests at stake and time-sensitivity of Petitioner's claims, this Court waives the seven-day waiting period customarily afforded under the Local Rules and respectfully directs the Clerk to effectuate the transfer as soon as possible. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 10/5/2023. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran. (Mailing envelope included)(meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 8/21/2023. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number 100000179. (meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Filing 2 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: It is hereby ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility; and it is further ORDERED that upon petitioner's compliance with this order, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on petitioner along with a blank IFP Application. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 8/2/2023. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran. (Mailing envelope included)(meb) [Transferred from New York Northern on 10/6/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.