Jones v. Nichols et al
| Quincy R. Jones |
| Asst. Warden Gray, Sgt. Nichols, Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr. and NC Dept. of Adult Corrections |
| 5:2024ct03198 |
| August 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Terrence W Boyle |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement as to Quincy R. Jones. (Hardy, Shari) |
| Filing 6 TRUST FUND INFORMATION REQUESTED (Hardy, Shari) |
Filing 5
Order (Prison Litigation Reform Act) - Response to Order due by 9/10/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 8/20/2024. Copy of Order sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. (Hardy, Shari)
|
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Quincy R. Jones 0564517 at Maury Correctional Institution. (Hardy, Shari) |
| Filing 3 INCOMPLETE Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Quincy R. Jones. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Quincy R. Jones. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr., Asst. Warden Gray, NC Dept. of Adult Corrections and Sgt. Nichols filed by Quincy R. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Hardy, Shari) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
