Lasorsa v. Bell
Ronald S. Lasorsa |
James Edward Bell, III |
5:2024cv00031 |
January 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Robert T Numbers |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Notice filed by James Edward Bell, III regarding #10 Response to Motion Corrected Affidavit of Defendant J. Edward Bell III. (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
Filing 11 Notice filed by James Edward Bell, III regarding #10 Response to Motion Corrected Affidavit of Eric William Flynn. (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion regarding #5 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Compliant, #9 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by James Edward Bell, III. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #5 Motion to Dismiss and MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Ronald S. Lasorsa. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance filed by Jeremy A. Stephenson on behalf of James Edward Bell, III. (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
Filing 7 Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #5 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Compliant. Response due by 3/5/2024. (Pro se party has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina.) (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support regarding #5 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Compliant filed by James Edward Bell, III. (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
Filing 5 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Compliant filed by James Edward Bell, III. (Stephenson, Jeremy) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL - All counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (Sellers, N.) |
Notice of Pro Se E-Noticing - Pro se party Ronald S. Lasorsa has consented to receiving electronic service of all motions, notices, orders, and documents in civil cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina. All documents filed in CM-ECF will be served on this party via email pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 5.1. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to James Edward Bell, III. (Summons issued at intake) (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Ronald S. Lasorsa. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Ronald S. Lasorsa (Not on the court's form). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Edward Bell, III (Filing fee $405.00 receipt number 5-00008255), filed by Ronald S. Lasorsa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lasorsa v. Bell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald S. Lasorsa | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Edward Bell, III | |
Represented By: | Jeremy A. Stephenson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.