Katona v. Apple, Inc. et al
| Joshua Katona |
| Apple, Inc., Frank Cox and Krista Baker |
| 5:2024cv00108 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Robert T Numbers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PLAN sent to all parties. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/15/2024. (Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff.) (McNally, Kimberly)
|
| Filing 9 Rule 12 Letter Issued as to #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Copy of letter mailed to Plaintiff.) (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. A memorandum in support should be filed at a separate docket entry using the 'Memorandum in Support' event. No action required by counsel at this time. However, failure to do so in future filings may result in a notice of deficiency and require refile. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Apple, Inc., Krista Baker, Frank Cox. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jazmine Hardnett) (Quesnelle, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Thomas Quesnelle on behalf of All Defendants. (Quesnelle, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 Financial Disclosure Statement by Apple, Inc., Krista Baker, Frank Cox (Smith, Frederick) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance filed by Frederick T. Smith on behalf of Apple, Inc., Krista Baker, Frank Cox. (Smith, Frederick) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/14/2024. (Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff.) (McNally, Kimberly)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Plaintiff regarding #1 Notice of Removal. (Copy of letter and a blank notice of self-representation mailed to Plaintiff.) (McNally, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Apple, Inc., Krista Baker, Frank Cox. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Notice of Removal. All counsel appearing on behalf of a party shall file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a). (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Notice to Counsel regarding: #1 Notice of Removal. Counsel did not properly identify exhibits pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual (i.e., "Exhibit A" is not a sufficient description). (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. (McNally, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Apple, Inc., Krista Baker, Frank Cox. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Smith, Frederick) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Superior Court of Wake County, case number 24CV002184-910. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7488184), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Smith, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
