Mclean v. Raleigh Police Department et al
| Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. |
| Raleigh Police Department, Brown, Lt. Batton and Officer Perrin |
| 5:2024cv00128 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Kimberly A Swank |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Notice Proposed Summons filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Collins, S) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Collins, S) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Kimberly A Swank regarding #16 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Collins, S) |
Filing 15
ORDER OF DEFICIENCY - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/15/2024. A copy of this Order and pro se packet sent via US mail to Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr., 323109, at Wake County Jail, P.O. Box 2419, Raleigh, NC 27602 (Collins, S)
|
| Filing 14 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 13 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Collins, S) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Pro Se Party Regarding Transfer of Case to the Eastern District of North Carolina. The party should read the notice in its entirety for additional information. (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina. Case Number 2:24-cv-00575. Transfer order and docket sheet obtained from transferring district. |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court hereby adopts and incorporates the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 7), and the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina so the proper district court may evaluate Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/27/2024. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.]
|
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. 330 S. Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27602. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.] |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned therefore RECOMMENDS that the Court transfer--rather than summarily dismiss--this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina so that the proper district court may evaluate Plaintiff's claims. Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/09/2024. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.] |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Anthony Marcelle Mclean, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) [Transferred from South Carolina on 2/28/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
