Kotolupova v. Garland et al
Anastasia Kotolupova |
Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Field Office Directo Jeff Sapko |
5:2024cv00198 |
March 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Brian S Meyers |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Summonses Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jeff Sapko. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Sellers, N.) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #6 Complaint. Counsel has not provided proposed summons(es) for all of the necessary parties for service of this action. You must prepare and file the additional proposed summons(es) as required by Rule 4(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Please file using the 'Notice- Other' event. (Sellers, N.) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance filed by Elizabeth A. Wood on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Wood, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 3730945.), filed by Anastasia Kotolupova. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons) (Galstyan, Vladimir) |
Filing 5 Order Redesignating Division to Western Division. This case is redesignated as a Western Division case. The Honorable Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge, will remain the presiding judge. All future filings should reflect the new case number of 5:24-CV-198-BO-BM. No further filing shall be made in 4:24- CV-52-BO-BM. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/1/2024. (Stouch, L.) |
Notice to Counsel - This case should have been filed in the Western Division. The Clerk will enter a reassignment order. (Stouch, L.) |
Notice to Counsel - No summons provided for issuance or Waiver of Service filed. Completed summons can be attached to the refiled complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #2 Financial Disclosure Statement and Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is reminded for future filings, when using a fillable PDF form, the Court prefers that these forms be "flattened" pursuant to Section B(3) of the Court's Electronic Policy and Procedure Manual available on the court's website. The civil cover sheet should be attached to the complaint. (Stouch, L.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #4 Complaint, #1 Complaint. Filing is not text searchable. Local Civil Rule 5.1 requires that all documents submitted for filing be in a text searchable format. Further, the signature line on the documents is incomplete pursuant to rule Local Civil Rule 10.1. Counsel is directed to refile. (Stouch, L.) |
Notice to Counsel regarding: #3 Notice of Special Appearance. All counsel should file a Notice of Appearance pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.2(a), including local counsel. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 7539507.), filed by ANASTASIA KOTOLUPOVA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Galstyan, Vladimir) |
Filing 3 Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Vladimir Galstyan on behalf of ANASTASIA KOTOLUPOVA. (Galstyan, Vladimir) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by ANASTASIA KOTOLUPOVA (Galstyan, Vladimir) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7539507.), filed by ANASTASIA KOTOLUPOVA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Galstyan, Vladimir) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.